On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:22:06 +0200, Chuck Norcutt
<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've never tried stitching macro before either but I think it would be
> very difficult. It would place a real premium on having the camera/lens
> adjusted very, very precisely to avoid parallax error between frames.
The photo is really not very macro-ish. It's supposed to be of a flower
in a vase. I was hoping that stacking two or three horizontal shots
would not prove too difficult. It think it can be done by just adjusting
the tripod height.
> I'm back. I was curious enough to perform my own 23 ppi experiment and
> the quality is actually better than I expected. I cropoed out a section
> of an image as described above and printed it on plain paper at low
> (text) quality to make an 8x10. At 6 feet away it looks pretty good but
> I can still see a bit of pixellation along the gunwale of a boat. By
> the time I'm 12 feet back all pixellation is gone.
That sounds great. I played around a bit with Rasterbator
(http://homokaasu.org/rasterbator/) some time ago, and it's amazing how
low resolution an image can be recognised in, from a distance.
/ Rickard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|