Subject: | [OM] e-410/11-22 |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Fenwick" <super.wide@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:53:22 +0100 |
Still trying with the E-410... In this kind of light the better dynamic range of the E-1 would probably be more useful, and the 410 is a bit unbalanced with the 11-22, but it's still fun! http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/university Tom ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Guess it doesn't have to be Olympus to be a Fang . . ., NSURIT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Guess it doesn't have to be Olympus to be a Fang . . ., Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Guess it doesn't have to be Olympus to be a Fang . . ., NSURIT |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: e-410/11-22, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |