In this general realm, 300135066242 on that site. Somebody got a
screaming deal here.
Piers Hemy wrote:
> Yes, I think that's right, Wayne. But he does say it's f/3.5 - I
> reckon 3.6 could be mistaken for 3.5, but 4 is less likely.
>
"It was fitted with a HOYA UV(0) 52mm in 1999 which has never been off."
It's the Cosina.
> And now that I have seen his other auction, I guess that he switched
> the 35-70 lenses around between the two bodies, with the 35-70/3.5-4.5
> which he more likely bought with the OM2000 ending up with the OM2.
>
Why would that be? I thought the Cosina made zoom was sold paired with
he Cosina made body. The Oly made 35-70/3.5-4.5 was sold together with
the OM-PC(OM-40) in an earlier pairing.
http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/OMPCbox.jpg
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender
immediately.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
