It's at least partly the lens since other lenses have been demonstrated
to outperform at least some Canyon wide angles on a FF Canyon digital
sensor... although that may not be true of the latest 16-35/2.8 (version
II). But even though the lens is at least partly to blame and can be
bested by others it doesn't mean that it didn't perform well on film.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
>
> So, any discussion of WAs and sensors which doesn't at least acknowledge
> that it's not just a lens problem, is likely to be misleading. Sure,
> Canyon's WA lenses may be less wonderful than other makes, but we don't
> really know that. Nobody else's recent AF lenses for film cameras have
> been subjected to the scrutiny and problems of FF sensors.
>
> I was not aware of anything about Canyon WA lenses before digital, but
> what I've run into since suggests that film users weren't of the opinion
> that they were inferior to other makes.
>
> Is it the Lens? Is it the Sensor?
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|