On 7/19/07 7:43 PM, "Andrew Fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was another who did not receive and Jan's had no luck sending it
> off list. Would some kind soul....
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Probably filtered as spam. Note the following annotation by my ISP:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.88 required=6 tests=[DRUGS_ANXIETY=3,
DRUGS_ANXIETY_EREC=0, DRUGS_ERECTILE=3, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05,
FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS=0.298, FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS3=1.113, SARE_ADULT2=1.42,
SPF_PASS=-0.001]
X-Spam-Level: ********
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Report: CleanMail Spam detection software has identified this
incoming email as possible spam. Content analysis details: (8.9 points)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------
1.1 FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS3 From: contains numbers mixed in with letters
0.3 FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS From: contains numbers mixed in with letters
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.4 SARE_ADULT2 BODY: Contains adult material
3.0 DRUGS_ERECTILE Refers to an erectile drug
3.0 DRUGS_ANXIETY Refers to an anxiety control drug
0.0 DRUGS_ANXIETY_EREC Refers to both an erectile and an anxiety drug
It's those two 3.0 scores of Walt's that do it :-) . But a cleaned-up
version wouldn't be Walt.
I've sent you a copy as a text file attachment - let me know if that worked.
Michael
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|