On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Moose wrote:
> I don't like the blown highlights on the cattle. Is this the E-510
> that's supposed to avoid blown highlights? (Still using Save for Web,
> which strips out EXIF, I suppose.)
Not the 510. The E-1. I haven't messed with this one in a while. It's
actually from last year. I'll see if I can do something about those
blown highlights. FWIW, they aren't all that blown in the print.
That, and I'm a card-carrying member of the wabi-sabi school of
photography, that is, the art of imperfection. <g>
> And I'd crop a bit more off the bottom, 't'were mine.
Consider it done, Obiwan!
> while we're on Jung and dreams, the content of symbolic layers is
> generally more significant than the manifest content.
More on the dream later. It does occur to me that the 33 admonition
might mean to start selling numbered prints, never printing an
edition larger than 33. <g-wink>
--Bob
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|