Subject: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 23:04:11 -0700 |
Not too unusual, I think. He mentions it from time to time especially when a review is delayed because of it. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On / June 29, 2007 CE, at 10:44 PM, Phil wrote: > DP review did have to replace the first E410 that they were > testing. I think > it was exposure problems > though. > > > Phil ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-510 Test Image, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 Replacement, Bob Whitmire |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |