Thanks Chuck, I really appreciate the comments. Yes, there are 3 pages,
and if people don't know, the photos will expand to full width just by
clicking on each one.
Continually changing lenses between the kit lens, Tamron 70-300mm, and
sometimes my "A 50mm" f1.4 MF lens that works in all auto modes - at
over 2500 images on the K10D I guess could have let a speck of dust in,
but I also have not seen any.
The Packard shot was done with the 18-55mm $79 kit lens which has a
decent bokeh, so the lens was opened up to about f8 to let parts of the
photo get a bit soft. (here's another of the Packard):
http://mutley.hypermart.net/GreenPackardLogo.jpg
The guy with the ivory jacket was a quick grab shot that I almost missed
done with the Tamron 70-300mm at about 180mm where the shake reduction
made it passable.
Larry
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Whoops! Somehow I hadn't realized there were three pages of images. I
> guess I was so carried away with a few images on page 1 that I forgot
> the other two pages were there. Anyhow, I didn't spot any dust bunnies
> on any of the other images. In particular, I didn't spot anything on
> the gent's ivory jacket where I would have expected to. Maybe just a
> few dark spots on the Packard.
>
> The photos are great, BTW. Your notion of closing in on details to
> avoid a cluttered background worked out very well. You have a good eye.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Larry wrote:
>
>> Trying to see these dust bunnies. Do you mean on the right? Towards the
>> top? Bottom? Middle? Any in the same position on other shots?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> I'm partial to the reflected green woodie and the green Packard
>>>
>>> ps: The Packard shot seems to show some dust bunnies on the fender,
>>> behind the fender at edge of the frame and just ahead of the medallion.
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>> Larry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Another great shot. You were up to the scanning challenge as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Speaking of cars, I posted some shots from the Greenwich Connecticut car
>>>> show (easier linking directly to the 3 specific posts). As I mentioned
>>>> in the post, the background and ambiance of the Greenwich Connecticut
>>>> car show was very busy, so I did closer sections of various cars, etc.
>>>> JPGs from the start. RAW was not involved.
>>>>
>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608253
>>>>
>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608328
>>>>
>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608396
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Olympus content: Taken with my K10D and either 18-55 kit lens, or
>>>> Tamron 70-300mm LD Di.
>>>>
>>>> For those comparing the attitudes in posts of "all the forums" here
>>>> last week, yet other than olympus, only Nikon/Canon were included
>>>> because every-other-brand-of-camera-doesn't-exist, these were shot with
>>>> one of those nonexistant brands :).
>>>>
>>>> Larry
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================
>>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> ==============================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
