Hi Joel,
Thanks for looking and commenting.
I guess you're referring to the pattern on the water surface. Same
pattern appeared in the sky but slightly less intense.
Since the original .jpeg shows homogeneous gray, but at 200% different
pixels show up from into the gray.
I applied a 33% amount unsharp mask of 60 pixel radius to the whole
image, and saturated green and red by an amount of 20%.
The pattern on the water began to show, so I selected using the magic
wand tool, that surface only. Then applied again the unsharp mask.
I was surprised by the result too, but if were to process the image
again I would exclude the gray sky from the first unsharp mask.
Keep in mind that I shot this through a thick glass, so there may be
some refraction but I cannot find it in the original file, no matter how
much do I blow it up.
I tried to open the window, but it was locked :( _ no surprise, we're
going through an unusually cold and humid autumn, so much that large
areas of this small country were flooded.
Oh, I loved your trophy shot of Mt. Hayden as much as anyone in the
list, but wouldn't post another one to say what is a general consensus:
it's a great photograph.
Fernando.
Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On 6/9/07, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/536655615/>
>>
>> bigger:
>>
>> <http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=536655615&size=o>
>>
>> Fernando.
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> I like the composition and effect of these very much. I like the
> swirls of grain in the water. May I ask how you did that? It don't
> appear to be a consequence of the usual film or digital processing.
>
> Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|