| Subject: | [OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 10:53:04 +1000 |
> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > some component of a lubricant. Who knows. But it is a unique problem > with this one OM lens. > The problem doesn't sound dissimilar to that of the problem rear element of the Zuiko 8/2.8 FishEye. ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DC Camera store Recomendations- yes., Rick Beckrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Some OM portraits from my visit to Indiana, Chris Crawford |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |