Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Portra 160VC for Flowers

Subject: [OM] Re: Portra 160VC for Flowers
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:49:52 +0100
Thanks, Ken.  The Blog looks very good.  I like the careful use of  
misspelling to spice up the reader's interest.  I didn't spot any run- 
on sentences though ... :-)

I might be a little careful about the displayed size of the top  
photo, excellent though it is.  It fills the whole of my MacBook  
screen and some visitors might not think to scroll down.  I might be  
tempted to take a crop of it or make it smaller.  Its a powerful  
image with a strong colour and would look just as good with either  
change, in my ever so humble opinion ...

Oh, and the articles aren't bad either ;-).  I enjoyed reading about  
Portra.  Does this mean that I have to start buying Kodak for the  
first time in aaaages?

But wait! I still have a whole pile of film in the beer fridge ...

Chris

On 16 May 2007, at 06:24, AG Schnozz wrote:

> In my newfangled blog I just added a little writeup (8-inches of
> run-on sentences and misspellings) on the "new" Kodak Portra 160VC.
> There are even a couple of samples illustrating two different scan
> techniques to give Velvia and Astia looks to the images.
>
> In a nutshell, I like it.  But please go read it for yourself.
>
> http://image66.blogspot.com
>
> AG



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz