Subject: | [OM] Re: FZ50 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 02 May 2007 16:24:24 -0400 |
From one of my posts earlier today: -------------------------------------- Check the ISO 100 studio shot here after processing with ACR (without noise reduction). And remember that this is a studio shot with 100% perfect lighting and well controlled dynamic range. Pretty disappointing. It's the proverbial problem or trying to squeeze 10 pounds of crap into a 5 pound bag. <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz50/page9.asp> ----------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Norcutt Joel Wilcox wrote: > I see. > > Can you indicate an example of an ISO 100 capture that gives you said pain? > > Joel W. >>> >>> On 5/1/07, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Too bad that, at 1-1/8" sensor size Panasonic chose to go for 10MP >>>> instead of a more rational number like 6. It pains me to see very clear >>>> noise at ISO 100. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: FZ50, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [E] OIS - Ouch, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: FZ50, Phil |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |