Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I should probably let Ali reply but, once again, I think Ali is talking
>> lens and sensor *quality*
> And I addressed my reply to issues other than pure DOF that affect
> apparent DOF - including lenses and sensor systems. I suppose nobody
> read it all,
I read it all.
>
> I also tried to answer what I thought was the real underlying question,
> "Is my E-500 inferior to the other major small sensor cameras in DOF?" -
> No - and affirm that the example image is, in fact, an example of good DOF.
Yes, I think that was the heart of the matter.
Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|