Subject: | [OM] Re: DOF question |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:58:08 -0400 |
Not ignored but it took me a while to answer it. It's a hard question and I'm tired enough that I probably didn't do it justice. Ask more if I didn't make it clear. Chuck Norcutt Ali Shah wrote: > Thanks. > > Why is my DOF question being ignored? Is it an overly > dumb question? Perhpas the simple answer is the > smaller sensor which cant absorb as much?!? > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: DOF question, Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |