And it's 716Kb when saved as a high quality jpeg.
Chris
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 26 March 2007 06:31:24 BDT
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Re: : OT Photo.
>
> According to 2 of my applications it is much larger than that.
> Certainly Firefox resizes it to 1100px wide for display, but it is
> actually 3872px wide according to Graphic Converter and the file is
> 28.8mb when saved on my hard drive.
>
> Chris
> ~~ >-)-
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
> www.threeshoes.net & homepage.mac.com/zuiko
>
>
> On 26 Mar 2007, at 05:17, Moose wrote:
>
>> Brian Swale wrote:
>>>> http://the.earth.li/~paddy/random/IMGP1781.jpg
>>>>
>>> .....
>>>
>>> A really nice shot. In a digital sense however, the file has
>>> some interesting
>>> characteristics. For a medium-sized file it strangely behaves as
>>> though it is
>>> much much larger.
>>>
>> Is your browser fooling you by reducing it to fit in the window? The
>> file is actually 1025 pixels wide and almost half a mb in size.
>>
>
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
www.threeshoes.net & homepage.mac.com/zuiko
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
