Check the reviews here. Look at the sample scans and see where your
pocketbook and scan quality meet up. Vincent Oliver, owner of the site
below, does about as thorough a job on review as you'll find anywhere.
<http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/scanners_page.htm>
Chuck Norcutt
Patrick Moore wrote:
> * On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 09:33:34AM -0400, Bob Whitmire said:
>> From personal experience, the 2450 (?) is crap with 35mm, much
>> better for MF, and sweet at 4x5; the 4990 is much better with 35mm,
>> but still not great, but does an excellent job with MF and LF. To get
>
> I have the middle range, Epson Perfection 4490 Photo and I'm more than
> happy with it. But I'm not really the most demanding of users. I don't
> shoot much film these days, spending most of my time with the K10D, but it
> does what I need and does it well. The 4490's draw back is that it can
> only take 12 35mm frames at one time. the 4990 can do 24 I think.
>
>> really nice results with a flatbed, I hear you need to go up to those
>> new V-series scanners, which are more expensive.
>
> I've heard this too. the V700 is a lovely beast.
>
> p.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|