Thanks Scott. This DL Di version of that lens works really well, and it
seems to be a Tamron loss-leader at $149 considering build quality, low
dispersal element, 6 year warranty, etc... I was trying to test for
bokeh and PF.
Larry
Scott Peden wrote:
> good shot guy, I'm jealous.
>
> My pics at 150 feet away from the red shoulder hawk yesterday aren't that
> sharp and clear, but that antique Sigma 600 is still loads better than what
> I was using.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Larry" <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:37 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Seagulls, was A little cottage, was Re: Re: Photo
>
>
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> My first outing with the Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6. This was at 300mm
>> close to wide open.
>>
>> Larry
>>
>>
>> Donald wrote:
>>
>>> Larry wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> K10D idea of a seagull:
>>>>
>>>> http://mutley.hypermart.net/SeaGull.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Larry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yowza! Good catch, Larry!
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
