But there is a lot of lesser crud there as well. Still, it's pretty
clean for 18 months.
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> Windor wrote:
>> The thing I carried away was that a simple couple of puffs from an
>> air bulb is amazingly more effective than any of them.
>
> That was quite intruiging to me too. I've got a couple of grubbies
> on my E-1 that could stand a blast or two of air. I'd suggest
> though, that the dust shakers are probably more effective at KEEPING
> a sensor clean vs cleaning the sensor.
>
> Another thing that I observed was the out-of-focus nature of dust on
> the E-system. That membrane is far enough away from the sensor to
> reduce a lot of dust issues--unless, of course, you happen to be
> using a pin-hole cap for a lens.
>
> http://image66media.com/Gallery/IsleRoyale01/P9056303040
>
> That, btw, is from an E-1 used for 18 months that has NEVER been
> cleaned. :) Those two dark ones will only show up when stopped down
> to F22.
>
> AG
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|