Subject: | [OM] Re: Pixel diffraction effects on resolution [was Mini Macro questions] |
---|---|
From: | ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:10:54 -0400 |
Very interesting. Always thought provoking when theory collides with reality. It might be instructive to remove the breeze as a variable. Cheers!/ScottGee1 On 3/19/07, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: SNIP! > My conclusion is that either this is another area where theory and > practice differ or some of the assumptions that go into the calculator > aren't true for the 5D. > SNIP! > > Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Abandoned buildings and Canadian Photographers., Michael Collins |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Pixel diffraction effects on resolution [was Mini Macro questions], Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] HU: F280 fang Potential, Daniel Sepke |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Pixel diffraction effects on resolution [was Mini Macro questions], Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |