Thanks for the info Frank.
The price was the reason, together with the f2.0-2.4 lens. On *Bay a bit
over £50, including W/A and tele converters etcetera. Evidently an ex-demo
outfit. However, I doubt if I would ever use it; I have a new E-1, an E-500,
and a C7070 Widezoom. The E500 will be sold to support the cost of the E-1
and the ED 18-180 lens that is sitting on it now. I expect to start selling
OM gear soon, including OM-4Ti(s), and some nice lenses. I have effectively
lost the sight in my right eye, and manual focusing has become a problem at
times. My new pensioner status has also meant a drastic fall in income, so I
need to economize quite a bit!
Roger Key,
Bagsvaerd, Danmark
>From: Frank van Lindert <Frank.van@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Re: E-20p
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar:59:07 +0100
>
>It has a 2/3" CCD.
>Have a look here:
>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse20/
>
>The price would be the only reason, I guess... but what would be
>cheap?
>I actually have one E-20N which is redundant, with TCON300, 1.4B,
>wide-angle and macro converters and many accessories. If you might be
>interested let me know off-line.
>
>Frank van Lindert
>Utrecht - Holland.
>
>On Thu, 15 Mar:28:37 +0100, you wrote:
>
> >
> >Does anyone know the size of the sensor in an E-20P? I assume that it is
> >less than the 4/3 sensor size. Are there any reasons to buy an E-20 cheap
> >instead of a newer E-series camera?
> >
> >Roger Key,
> >Bagsvaerd, Danmark
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|