Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Ultimate cheap macro -- take 2 (much cheaper, even more macro-y

Subject: [OM] Re: Ultimate cheap macro -- take 2 (much cheaper, even more macro-y)
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:48:43 -0700
AhHaaa, I think I have seen your work before, I think you are the person who
infected me with the Ultra macros......

The colors on the needle appear to me to just be the color of the metals
used to manufacture that item.

The rubber bands.......I'm still grinning about how basic, high technology
is. You related to the writer for the show of MacGilver?

Need more light? Use a 9 V battery and some steel wool. (but not to near the
camera!)

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Dan Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:00 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Ultimate cheap macro -- take 2 (much cheaper, even more
macro-y) 

  Someone, reasonably, pointed out that my previous 'ultimate cheap 
macro studio' wasn't as cheap as all that, given it's based on one of 
the 20mm Zuiko lenses.

  So, inspired by Dean's doing the same thing, I picked up an old 7mm 
wide-angle Elgeet lens for 8mm film [1] and reversed it. In keeping with 
the cheap spirit of things, I used a jam-jar lid to mount it on.

  The lens I got, for some reason, had a threaded metal insert in the 
'outer' end, which made mounting it trivial; I just drilled a 7/16" (if 
I remember) hole into the jar lid and screwed things into place:

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/galleries/E330/macro2/0_lens_assembly_bef
ore.jpg

  Next step; take an old junk 2x converter, remove the lens mount, 
Dremel extra bits off, and epoxy that onto the back of the jar lid:

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/galleries/E330/macro2/1_lens_assembly_bef
ore.jpg

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/galleries/E330/macro2/2_lens_assembly_dur
ing.jpg

  (notice how even though the hole isn't dead center on the lid, when I 
epoxied things on, I could center it relative to the mount. It turns out 
that probably doesn't matter too much anyway, but it's nice to try).

  Final result:

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/galleries/E330/macro2/4_lens_final_mount.
jpg


  Total cost: $10 for a junk 2x converter, $5 for the lens, nothing for 
the jamjar lid.

  But what's that I hear you say? $10 is too much to spend on a 2x 
converter that you're just going to discard? Well, then, use a body cap. 
But what if a body cap is still too much expense? Well, don't use one of 
those either... Warning: the next photo may not be suitable for those of 
a weak constitution:

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/galleries/E330/macro2/3_lens_ultimate_che
ap_mount.jpg

  (and, yes, it worked fine like that; no light leaks, I think because 
the lid was coincidentally just the right size )


  Some resulting shots here:

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/index.php?gallery=./E330/macro2

  Field of view is something around 2mm across (so "18x magnification" 
in 35mm terms); depth of field isn't a whole lot, but it's certainly 
more than nothing, and working distance is half an inch or so. Lighting 
works much better if I hold a bit of white paper above the E-330 to 
bounce the builtin flash around, but it works okay without that.

  It's surprisingly difficult to find things that small to take photos 
of; most man-made things don't have detail at that scale, so I mostly 
have texture or unexpected crinkliness to go with. As it's still winter 
in these parts of the world, there's not a lot of plants to take photos 
of for now.

  I'm not sure if

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/index.php?gallery=./E330/macro2&image=hai
r.jpg

  (the lens mounted on a 65-116 tube this time around) actually shows 
the individual scales on the hair or if it's just a weird artifact or 
dust or something..


  Does anyone know why closeups of metal have strange rainbow effects?

http://www.danielmitchell.net/sgal/index.php?gallery=./E330/macro2&image=nee
dle_eye.jpg

  has a distinctive pattern of coloured specks on the surface -- it's 
not CCD noise, so is it just diffraction effects or something optical 
like that?

  -- dan


[1] Is that a 7mm 8mm lens, or an 8mm 7mm lens?

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz