What you say may be true, but if a skilled tester like Askey has
trouble getting resolution out of it there is no question its
difficulty in use is beyond the abilities of most of the people who
bought it.
To characterize the production of Disney color and compressed hues as
a camera characteristic rather than settings indicates to me that you
have lost your objectivity and makes me skeptical of the other stuff
you said which I was inclined to take at face value.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Mar 14, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Paul Martinez wrote:
> That's what you get for believing "tests". How many of them rated
> various
> Zuiko's as sub par? Truth is, put a GOOD lens on a Kodak SLR/c and
> it will
> put the D2x resolution to shame. It will even give better edge
> detail and
> color than the current Canon FF DSLR's. I've used the Kodak DSLR
> for over
> two years now and it is no different than any other camera. Learn it's
> strengths and weakness, and make the best of it. It is a very
> reliable,
> consistent performing DSLR that still has some of the best color
> and doesn't
> easily blow highlights like most other DSLR's - all at a very useable
> ISO160. To say "color was awful" is just plain ignorant. I post all
> the time
> on FredMiranda and everyone there (Canon, Nikon, Oly owners) always
> comment
> how great the colors are. Of course, if you prefer Disney color and
> compressed hues there are other cameras to choose from.
>
> Paul
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|