> Perhaps one of you optically brilliant guys can explain something to
> me.
Not the right guy to ask.
>Why does it seem impossible to build an optical viewfinder that
> reasonably reflects the state of the lens?
Costs too much for a feature that the market niether understands or wants.
> and they are taking the option of leaving them out entirely.
Because the average user doesn't want to use one.
> And what happened to a new improved EVF? It would be better than nothing.
Again, costs too much for a feature that is beyond most buyers.
Bill Pearce
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|