That's one of those internal contradictions that afflicts all
negative approaches such as skepticism (can you be contrary about
being contrary and so on...) I just decline to 'frame' :-)
Alas the only kind of existentialism that ever got you laid was the
tortured, angst-ridden type and I was much too cheerful and
optimistic for that.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 12/03/2007, at 3:56 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> It's clearly not all random and absurd since it would be impossible to
> frame any concept of randomness or purposelessness without order,
> purpose, and teleology, ultimately. I know these statements about all
> being random and absurd have gotten you laid a few times and a few
> free drinks, Andrew, but I'm afraid you're going to have to read Kant
> after all. The existentialists lack a bit of humility and patience.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|