There is an interview somewhere. They were trying to keep it small
and the light rays parallel to the sensor which is probably even more
critical with the deep wells of that style of sensor.
Here it is:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/10705/sigma_interview/
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Mar 8, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Intersting. And 28mm equivalent to boot. But f/4???? Give me a
> break.
> It should have been an f/2 or better.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|