[OM] Re: Communications [was lighting]

[Chuck Norcutt]

Because the part that you didn't quote from your previous post says:
"AG's responses are for the most part the same thing. I rarely see a 
previous post on his responses. This is the way I choose to respond so 
the majority's needs are satisfied. I can't please 100% w/o fail. This 
is the next best thing."

I said "balderdash" because what you've written is a bunch of 
self-serving drivel.  I'm late in responding here since I wanted to 
respond with facts.  I finally took the time to review that last 25 of 
AG's posts.  All except a few contain appropriate text clipped from the 
prior post to maintain the context.  Of those that don't 2 or 3 were 
originated by him and another couple were very short and the context was 
apparent by the subject line alone.  There isn't a single one of the 25 
where anything at all is unclear.

I think you owe AG (and the list) an apology.

Chuck Norcutt


Allen Coltrin wrote:
> Why?
> 
> Allen
> 
> Balderdash!
> 
> Chuck Norcutt

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================