Robert Swier wrote:
> But isn't "Live-MOS" somehow susposed to be the best of both worlds?
> Low power comsumption, like CMOS, but good image quality, like CCD?
Have you perhaps been reading to much promotional material written by
marketing people?
Live-MOS in a DSLR is not to date quite up to the overall performance of
the best CCD or CMOS. What it does, that they don't (or hadn't - the C
1D Mark III has CMOS and live view), is to allow live view. That's the
excitement.
> I have never seen an explaination about how such a thing is possible,
>
Anything is possible in the imagination. And may turn out to be possible
with further development of the technology.
> but I imagine that the images are just fine.
>
Samples from the E-410 look exactly like that, "just fine", but not the
best available.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|