I agree. The "artists" statements are often harder to take than the
images. I think most artists should stick to paint.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> The writing is as bad as the images, and pretentious as well.
>>
>
> I've just been looking at a US magazine "FOCUS Fine Art Photography
> Magazine", while the images themselves are much more appealing to me than
> those Moose was describing I get really p*ssed off by the pretentious
> writing, e.g. "...issues of transition and history, they're also concerned
> with the role of the human witness in environments that have come to reveal
> the allegorical richness disclosed within a hidden world of remnants." to
> describe some images of an old cemetery. Maybe I'm just anti-intellectual,
> perhaps I've just had to listen to too much b*ll sh*t over the last 50
> years.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|