Dave - I haven't noticed a WTB on this list - keeping an eye out is hardly
enough.
AG - the front element may well be big, but I can't have you describing it
as nasty. I know perfectly well why Joel won't let you look at his, because
if you were to do so, you would understand why it isn't nasty, it's
preciousssss. Apologies to JRR Tolkien.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of AG Schnozz
Sent: 01 March 2007 02:35
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: B&W Monster
Dave wrote:
--snip
> I've been keeping an eye out for a 24 shift, but they're a bit rare
> these days. So, I've been thinking of a 35. Do you find enough
> opportunity for it? I've love the 24/2.8 field of view, so I'm a bit
> uncertain...
Yeah, the Cannonites all swept through here last year and sucked the supply
dry. The 24/shift is a huge lens with a big, nasty looking front lens
element. The 35/shift is very compact in comparison and takes the normal
49mm filters I very much enjoy using shift lenses.
If I did a lot of interior work, the 24/shift would be nice, but in reality,
the 35/shift is probably the more practical and usable lens.
However, Joel won't let me even look at his 24/shift...
> And, what's up with this somewhat cryptic "the house"?
http://www.image66media.com/page17.html
First picture.
AG
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|