It certainly looks like a bargain.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Moose wrote:
> I don't know about hot and new. In what appears to be the same size
> range, perhaps a tniy bit smaller, the Canon 200 EG has worked very
> well
> for me for WAY less money. Take off the Canon logo, and it looks like
> any old generic backpack, not an expensive camera equipment holder.
> Inside, it has a highly adjustable interior of padded separators and a
> place for my laptop. Water resistant, but not proof.
>
> And the price is certainly right, $39 with free shipping from Amazon
> <http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Deluxe-Backpack-200EG-Cameras/dp/
> B00009R6TA/sr=8-1/qid=1172099828/
> ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-1577016-3476151?ie=UTF8&s=electronics>.
> I think it was $35 when I bought one. I think it is the standout value
> for a photo backpack.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|