Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: (OT) (Long?) Search for an affordable & effective image editing

Subject: [OM] Re: (OT) (Long?) Search for an affordable & effective image editing program
From: Russ Butler <rbinnj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:48:39 -0500
Brian Swale wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
[snip]

> So I have been looking for a program with brush / clone / "airspray" tools 
> that 
> can be finely tuned and which are capable of being adjusted to being applied 
> very gradually in tiny steps.
> 

You may want to evaluate this:

http://www.photofiltre-studio.com/frames-en.htm

It's fast, small, does layers, and has the tools you seek. And like 
Irfranview, it can use 8bf plugins/tools. Two that I use a lot are very 
handy -

http://free.pages.at/easyfilter/smartcurve.html
a very good curves tool,
and

an LCE tool
http://www.photo-plugins.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=1


[snip]

> 
> Last night I downloaded all 12MB (two files without the Help) of the XP 
> version of The Gimp.   Download took about 80 minutes !!
> 
> With a lot of experimentation over about 3 hours I was able to ascertain that 
> several of the brush, clone etc tools can be screwed down low enough to 
> make fine, incremental adjustments, and although they are small tools, if the 
> image is at 200% or 300% when editing, that doesn't seem to matter.
> 
> So, the way I am thinking is that The Gimp might well become my main tool 
> for extensive manipulation, and that the $130 NZ that I was prepared to part 
> out with for PWP will go a long way to getting me a 2 -  3 GHZ machine 
> already loaded with XP.

I've used the GIMP a bit. It's quite a bit slower, much larger, and 
harder (at least for me) to use than photofiltre-studio. (pfs)

Another option to consider is ImageMagick if you are comfortable using 
the command line, but it only runs on Win 98 and above. The learning 
curve is a bit steep, but the program is very powerful and both 8-bit 
and 16-bit versions are available (free).

http://www.imagemagick.org/script/binary-releases.php#windows

I use imagemagick on 16-bit raw scans to expand the histogram without 
clipping and do a safe touch of LCE. That gets me about 90+% of the way 
in 16-bit. It's all done on a set of scans in a batch file. I then do 
fine tuning, manual dust removal, etc. in pfs.


-- 
Russ Butler (NJ USA)



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz