Thanks for sharing, Mike. It's a little hard to tell from the scan
about the grain and resolution as it's got a lot of jaggies. Do you
know why?
Joel W.
On 2/18/07, usher99@xxxxxxx <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Recently trying out the Tam 400 f4 with 1.4 TC and the new Koduck Portra
> 400vc (freebie). Took this with the Tam 35-105,OM2 of a bird watching tower.
> This is about a 50% crop. The prints looked quite good for 400 speed film.
> It did not scan as well as I had hoped , though better than most (?any) 400
> film. I think I could use this film on occassion. Photo could use much
> work, though here it is anyway.
>
>
> http://gordon9213.zoto.com/img/original/ba238899bddf3b2194864f74be5aa257.jpg
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|