Subject: | [OM] Re: LightRoom v.1 news |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:43:52 -0800 |
So you need both Aperture and PS? Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Jan 22, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > I have given up on LightRoom, preferring > Aperture instead even though it means that I will have to upgrade to > CS3 if I wish to speed up Photoshop's performance with my Intel > processors. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Reasons to always carry a camera - OT or not., Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: LightRoom v.1 news, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: LightRoom v.1 news, Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: LightRoom v.1 news, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |