On 1/21/07, Dan Mitchell <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Using the RM-1 plus anti-shock gives one a huge feeling of
> > confidence,
>
> Why do you use both -- if you're using anti-shock then presumably
> timing isn't essential when taking the shots, and in that case couldn't
> you just add another couple of seconds of MLU/anti-shock/whatever to
> handle possible motion from pressing the shutter?
>
> Or is it just so you know you've done everything possible?
>
> -- dan
Yeah, belt and suspenders. More to the point, I don't always use
anti-shock, but I almost always use the RM-1 when the camera is
supported. So when I use anti-shock I wouldn't want to confuse myself
by NOT using the RM-1. I'm not too clever. A reasonable set of
habits is often my only saving grace.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|