Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OT]I surprised for JPEG of Panansonic DMC-LX2

Subject: [OM] Re: [OT]I surprised for JPEG of Panansonic DMC-LX2
From: Michael Wong <mialop@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:39:32 +0800
Yes, I agree that. I'd still keep RAW shooting to save any exposure &  
white balance errors.


---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user



在 21 Jan 2007 10:13 PM 時,Chuck Norcutt 寫到:

> The characteristic of your very beautiful image is that it does not  
> have
> a very large dynamic range.  Except for the very deepest of shadows it
> fits very comfortably within the brightness range of a JPEG.  As  
> long as
> the dynamic range required is modest and the exposure and white  
> balance
> are correct there is really nothing to be gained by shooting raw.
>
> Dr. Flash confided to me that he shoots raw because he makes lots of
> exposure and white balance errors (especially when shooting flash)
> despite having all the tools to avoid them.  He's been looking for  
> some
> more common sense but can't seem to find any for sale.  :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Michael Wong wrote:
>>
>>
>> Last week I went to a new garden in HK & took some pictures by LX2. I
>> surprised that the JPEG performance of LX2 is excellent. I may be
>> consider to take JPEG only in the future.
>>
>> JPEG, resize & add USM only.
>> http://www.omgallery.net/albums/album68/P1000235.jpg
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz