I'll try to compare my early 38/2.8 with my 38/3.5.
My own experience has been that the lighting used to look at
reflections can dramatically change what is seen. It's dark when I get
home so I may not be able to see anything until this weekend.
-jeff
obviously I can't see typos even when there is plenty of light ....
On 1/10/07, Jeff Keller <jeffreyrkeller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There was a 38/3.5 labeled
> OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC MACRO 1:3,5 f=38mm 202669
>
> It seems unlickely that Olympus would replace a MC 38/3.5 with a
> single coated 38/2.8.
>
> Watching for serial nos. on the macro lenses doesn't yield much data
> very quickly. Few auctions have adequate pictures to show how the lens
> is marked.
>
> If your 38/2.8's are labeled different from
> OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO AUTO-MACRO 38mm 1:2,8 101006 Japan
>
> would you please send me exact labels? Thank you,
>
> -jeff
>
> On 1/10/07, Dean Hansen <hanse112@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello OMers,
> > Dan pointed out a 38/2.8 OM macro lens listed we-all-know-where by
> > Henry's (280067513249) that "is not the current MC version with the
> > multi-coating; it is its predecessor with purple/amber coating." I
> > didn't know that there were two versions of this lens. Henry's lens has
> > a serial number of 1012xx; two of mine are 1048xx and 1049xx and show
> > green and violet reflections, which I presume means multi-coated.
> > Anyone out there with a single-coated 38/2.8 macro lens?
> > Dean
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|