Thanks, Bernard, that was very useful.
Chris
On 9 Jan 2007, at 21:34, Bernard Frangoulis wrote:
>> Any offers of information?
>>
>> Chris
>
> Look this up:
> http://www.snowhenge.net/pblog/archives/000261.html
>
> Also, some ancient posts by OzRay on http://fourthirdsphoto.com/
> forums.
>
> The 8mm does not appear to be so much smaller than the 11-2mm2,
> only a bit shorter:
> 8mm: 79mm (D) x 77mm (L), 485g
> 11-22mm: 75mm (D) x 92.5mm (L), 485g
>
> But still considerably bigger and heavier than a 21/3.5 ;-)
>
> FWIW, I have had a 11-22mm (now sold to help my migration to N*kon
> stuff...), and it was about the same size and weight as my 14-54mm,
> no difference in handling. The 11-22mm is an _excellent_ lens.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|