>From what I've read, Reala is hard to print to its full potential.
For that reason, I've done very little with it. Shot some years ago
in both 35mm and MF and was impressed by the results but got scared
off by its difficult reputation. The custom lab I used at that time
is out of business. Fuji booths at photo shows used to feature
enormous prints from Reala that were spectacular.
Any wisdom on this? Have I missed out on something wonderful for all
the intervening years?
ScottGee1
On 1/9/07, AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Chuck wrote:
> > Hah! I didn't even know there was a K200. But I'm with Wayne.
> > E100VS is really nice stuff.
>
> When I needed ISO 100 in a slide film, I typically used Fujichrome
> 100 pushed one stop until I could no longer find any left and then
> switched over to Provia pushed one stop. I did use K200 a few times,
> but it lacked a lot of punch.
>
> The films really are as good as ever. Ilford PanF, Delta 100, Delta
> 400 and Kodak Tri-X are all very very good B&W films. Fuji has
> brought back Velvia 50. Kodak has a new and improved lineup of the
> already outstanding Provia films... Oh, and don't forget that Fuji
> Realla is still the only capture medium to handle mixed lighting
> without sickening colorcasts. (if only digital was as good).
>
> AG
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|