Subject: | [OM] Re: Twin Lens 3.1 MP Rolleiflex Mini Digital Camera |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:26:20 -0800 |
Did we use the same link? Oh, I just checked again. They corrected the placement of the decimal points. It was 19.3" x 28.7" x 17.7". Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Jan 5, 2007, at 12:34 PM, AG Schnozz wrote: > > I guess your balls are bigger than mine. > > 1.93" x 2.87" x 1.77" > 49x73x45mm WxHxD > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Approaching demise of P&S?, Winsor Crosby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: One more shot, then bye for a while, Walt Wayman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Twin Lens 3.1 MP Rolleiflex Mini Digital Camera, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Twin Lens 3.1 MP Rolleiflex Mini Digital Camera, ScottGee1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |