Thanks, Moose. I have studied a lesson. Thank you very much!!!
For my option, I'd like to separate 2 pictures to identify the subject
obviously.
--
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
2007/1/3, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Michael Wong wrote:
> > ....
> > For the picture, I selected the wooden bridge and the highest 2 trees
> > for the contrast of composition. The wooden bridge leads readers' eyes
> > to the trees. The shadow of trees at the river increases the interest
> > for the photo. Of course the interest points are the woman & the dog.
> > It was my thinking while I took this picture.
> >
>
> I can see where you are going with this composition, and I rather like
> it. I think some post processing and a crop can strengthen it.
>
> I also see the point of those who have commented on complexity in the
> composition being possibly confusing. That tends to happen when a shot
> includes more than one "sub-composition". That doesn't mean one
> shouldn't do it, but being aware of it can help in choosing compositions.
>
> More comments and some visual illustrations
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/MWong/IMG1862.htm>.
>
> Moose
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|