Moose wrote:
> Michael Wong wrote:
>> Yes, Moose, I should read more reviews related models I'm interested.
>> I knew the noise performance of LX2 is not very good but didn't expect
>> so worse at ISO200 :(
> Yup, some of the new crop of high mp digis are showing noise at base iso.
>> Except noise problem, I satisfy its performance.
> Looks like a wonderful camera in all other respects. I would find it
> very appealing, but I am a noise hound - and already have my little
> camera. ;-)
>
> Moose
Please observe the above, vs. the below:
> Michael Wong wrote:
>> Yes, Moose, I should read more reviews related models I'm interested.
>> I knew the noise performance of LX2 is not very good but didn't
>> expect so worse at ISO200 :(
> Yup, some of the new crop of high mp digis are showing noise at base
> iso.
>> Except noise problem, I satisfy its performance.
> Looks like a wonderful camera in all other respects. I would find it
> very appealing, but I am a noise hound - and already have my little
> camera. ;-)
I ask you: Which is the more readable/understandable?
It's worth the effort...
keith whaley
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|