I wasn't describing a lens. I was describing the range of focal lengths
covered by my two most commonly carried OM mount lenses mentioned in
that note; a Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5 and a Kiron 7-150/4.
I also have 35-135 Kiron but, like the Tokina, it's a bit heavy. But if
you've got a 35-150/4 that only weighs about a pound I'd be interested :-)
Chuck Norcutt
keith_w wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>>Welcome, Louis. You'll have to decide yourself on focal length for your
>>primes based on your budget and other criteria. But if you want to make
>>optical performance the main criteria you can check them all here:
>><http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm>
>>But if you've been lurking here for a while you probably already know
>>about Gary Reese's Zuiko (and other) lens tests.
>
>
> [...]
>
>>No doubt you'll get 100 other recommendations but these days 35-150
>>covers 90% of my needs.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I have a Tokina 35-135mm Macro zoom, f/3.5-4.5, that is mounted on my
> OM-1. It's a marvelous lens, with a good reputation, and the only
> drawback is, it's *heavy*!
>
> Any chance your 35-150 is really a 35-105?
> I don't see a 35-150 Zuiko listed anywhere.
>
> keith whaley
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|