ONLY thing wrong with the 100/2 that I can see is the ridiculous little
built-in lens hood - no use whatever... though I don't suppose it actually
does any harm. Otherwise it's my favourite lens at the moment - you really
do need one ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of keith_w
Sent: 16 December 2006 12:09
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Newby Intro + Zuiko prime lens question
Martyn Smoothy wrote:
> Louis,
>
> Welcome to the list
>
> For what it's worth... Wouldn't worry too much about the 50/1.4 serial
> number if I were you. I have 2 of these, one above & one below 1,100,000,
> can't say I've ever noticed any significant difference between them. For
the
> portrait lens go for the 100/f2 if possible (I sold all 3 of the others
you
> mention after buying the 100/f2 - very nearly paid for it).
I have an unrequited infatuation with the 100mm f/2.0, but haven't put
the money together to buy one yet...
I have some photo gear that's going to go on the block soon, and when I
amass a sufficient "nut" I will finally buy that lovely lens!
I know someone on the list has at least one, and I'll announce my
readiness soon!
keith whaley
> By an amazing coincidence I happen to have a very nice 28mm/f2.8 on the
bay
> at the moment (180062585322) - free postage if anyone from the list buys
> it... :-)
>
> Regards - Martyn
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|