Subject: | [OM] Re: Ni*on camera in the Economist |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:25:50 -0800 |
Infinitesimal. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:40 PM, IanG wrote: > I've always wondered does infinity apply only to *big* or does it > also apply > to *little* - after all if there is always a *bigger* there must > also always > be a *littler*. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Age concern, Karl-Hans Lehnet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: How young we all are in 2006, John Hudson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Ni*on camera in the Economist, IanG |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Ni*on camera in the Economist, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |