Why would you use JPEG for display and the uncompressed TIFF for print
when any display device technology has a far greater dynamic range than
any print technology. Doesn't make sense to me.
Chuck Norcutt
Philip Pemberton wrote:
>
> Basically, JPEG chops an image into 8x8 pixel blocks (or 16x16 if you have
> the
> compression turned WAY up), then processes those blocks, repeating previous
> blocks as necessary to save space. At some compression levels, those 8x8
> blocks are visible - that's JPEG blocking.
>
> ... Which is why you save the RAWs, convert to JPEG for display, and print
> from uncompressed TIFFs. Or at least that's what I do. Maybe I'm just a
> little
> obsessive about quality :)
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|