Chris Barker wrote:
> Richard, this is my 3rd reply, but I thought that I would mention
> that I think that the underlining of "Richard Lovison" is
> superfluous, for 2 reasons: the underlining of words or lines has
> been taken over by hyperlinks on the Internet; it distracts from the
> elegance of the text; and (3 reasons ;-)) it is double-emphasis as
> you have large, bold type already.
Chris,
Thanks for the feedback... the underlining is history. :)
Richard L
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|