I contacted the seller to ask about the purported 180mm lens. Said I
didn't see it in the photo. Here is his response:
"if you dont see the lens in the photo then i dont have it. im sorry
for the confusion. happy budding!"
Minor oversight, eh?
FWIW/ScottGee1
On 12/5/06, Jim Couch <Zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The really flat one looks like it is probably a 21 f3.5 hood. The other
> looks like a generic 50mm hood.
>
> Jim Couch
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> >The really flat one looks interesting. Must be for really wide angle or
> >else is cut off from a longer hood. However, I haven't a clue what
> >either of them are and I'd be taking a risk in even calling them Olympus
> >
> >Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Look at the second picture. Two Olympus lens hoods and a lens cap.
> >>Pictures suck, however is it trash or treasure? eBay # 270064344438. Bill
> >>Barber
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|