Back in love again, eh? A month or two ago I thought you wouldn't have
given a plugged nickel for it. Low resolution images were bad for
business, etc., etc. What happened :-)
Chuck Norcutt
AG Schnozz wrote:
> ...Moose wrote stuff about pixel counts and portraits...
>
> I'm finding it rather interesting how cropping just isn't an
> issue with me. With the E-1, I'm shooting to fill the frame and
> not really leaving anything on the table. It not only
> streamlines my post-processing, but it also maximizes what few
> pixels I have.
>
> Now, with landscapes, you crop for the composition, but that's a
> different animal altogether.
>
> End result for MOST print sizes is that my E-1 is pretty well
> matching the results I got from medium-format. Granted, we're
> talking portraiture here, but the key with portraiture isn't
> necessarily inner-detail, but edge-detail. If you've preserved
> the edges, the lack of inside details are overlooked--if not
> welcomed.
>
> I'll still take more megapixels, but not at the expense of the
> coloring and nuance that the Olympus gives me. I've had several
> Nikon and Canon portraiture people look at my images and wonder
> what PP I did to them to get the colors like that while
> maintaining the skin tones.
>
> IQ is more than MP.
>
> AG
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now.
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|