Might have been in some link posted here since I just read the same
thing within the past few days. I was amazed that such simple stuff
(actually, a bit tedious since the box was already assembled) could
yield clearly superior results.
Chuck Norcutt
Bill Pearce wrote:
>
>>I bought an inexpensive Canon and haven't noticed any improvement over
>>the old scanner. The dynamic range and inherent resolution of the
>>reflective source material just isn't all that great and doesn't
>>challenge the scanner's capabilities.
>
> I just read something somewhere on the web about a guy that opened up his
> flatbed and painted the interior flat black. Just thinking about the process
> makes my head hurt.
>
> Anyway, it made a substantial improvement in the image, mostly in, surprise,
> shadow detail.
>
> This is something that I've wondered about for some time. Makes you wonder
> what the design engineers are thinking about. how simple that would be from
> the factory.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|