Keep the OM since you can use OM lenses on the 300D with an inexpensive
($20-30) adapter.
Chuck Norcutt
Allan Mee wrote:
> Yep the Canon 300D is a revelation - the quality of the images from it are
> *FAR* superior to those from my OM2!
> It still feels a strange to use - I'm not normally nervous when using a new
> camera - but I took a few shots today of a friend's baby - and it kinda felt
> like I was using somebody else camera I was usig it so gingerly lol
> But the images from it are stunning! Love it. I might sell either my OM2 or
> Canon A1 (I wanna keep at least one decent film SLR as a backup and still
> occasionally shoot film - I'm not afraid to use and abuse my film SLRs -
> they're used to it! lol
> Allan
>
>
>
>
> PS No trees were harmed in the sending of this message and a very large
> number of electrons were asked their permission to be terribly
> inconvenienced. (And threw a party for them afterwards for being really cool
> about it).
>
> Disrupting the unnatural balance that you, as a conscious human being and a
> confused mass of energy, have created.
> -Disturb the mind -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V3 #320
>>Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:48:06 -0800
>>
>>
>>Allan,
>>Congratulations on your 300D. Going digital will be a revelation for
>>you, as it
>>was for me four years ago.
>>
>>You're right that you can get stuff on low light with digital you
>>could never
>>get with film. I took a sports photography course in 2004 with one of
>>SI's leading
>>staff photographers, Peter Read Miller, and he commented that they
>>now can
>>cover sporting events with digital in low or available light that
>>would have been impossible with film.
>>
>>The print quality is better too, especially with today's inkjets.
>>
>>You'll never look back.
>>
>>P.S. I saw your previous post on how your 300D is the best
>>camera you've ever owned, or possible ever used...
>>perhaps it's best that Moose and I withhold our 5D and 1D MkII's
>>respectively! You think you're spoiled now... ;-)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Stephen.
>>
>>On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Listar wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I really am amazed at the performance of the 300D - especially in
>>>very low
>>>light conditions. I'm definitely gonna get a T-mount for it and do
>>>some
>>>astro-photography next year! (I've got a T mount adaptor that fits
>>>into the
>>>eyepiece tube of a reflector). I did think digital would be rubbish
>>>in low
>>>light conditions - but I'll stick my neck out and say digital is
>>>better than
>>>film for low ight conditions / night work!
>>>Allan
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Download the new Windows Live Toolbar, including Desktop search!
> http://toolbar.live.com/?mkt=en-gb
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|